![]() There is a reason in every business their is the phrase "the customer is always right" It's because I'm looking for something, and if Luminar can't do it, then I will spend my money on a project that does. You need a way to take customer request from these forums and get them incorporated into the dev cycle. 1st: Get a beta program with potential customers so you can get feedback into the dev cycle prior to release. My two cents, and please share these with upper management. It allows me to do things I need/want to do. It's why I initially started to there solution, and while I prefer Luminar, I recently purchased the upgrade to On1 Photo Raw, because it's more usable. On1 photo has started to adopt some of the ideas you guys put forward in Luminar 3/4. It also makes you extremely vulnerable to competition as many people in the photo community see Luminar as a half baked solution. The very public backlash to the DAM feature suffered from the same broken strategy. Luminar aggressively markets next generation technology that isn't ready to meet customers expectations. It's also why I was hopeful that there would be a demo version of Luminar AI. I saw huge potential with it, It's why I purchased, v3 and v4. I like Luminar, been a customer since version 2018. Leveraging NVIDIA CUDA tech could be a serious competitive advantage against all of the other lessor known editors and would have put Luminar on par with Adobe. ![]() The irony here is this a huge missed opportunity for Luminar to be a world class editor. Adobe, Capture 1, On1 Photo raw, Topaz labs, all support GPU off loading. ![]() I will be honest, performance considers is why I didn't pre-order Luminar AI.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |