![]() I wished it had been so easy with that edior from sonic in the earlier days, i wouldnt need that nice screen on the rm1x and my korgs.Īlso look at that little clip, i also instant bought the launchpad xl. What you want more? And there is a growing community where you can get tons of patches, templates, etc. Today they have a implementation.īut this is not a tool what you want as a little musican, its a pro editor for studios and and still a kind of sience.īelive me, you dont need a screen!! It also 2would deviates you from that super intuitive machine! And there are easy to use editors from circuit and sonicstudios. There was no specific editor,sure some pro tools like Midi Quest for 325.- and thats a non specific editor. This machine was is the example fór a not intuitive sequenzer. do you know the old Yamaha RMX 1? This thing have a big display with many infos for that time, but the sequenzer programming and all i want to do with it was nearly immpossible… horror. I first saw the editor before i bought the machines, then insant buy!! Its so fantastic what you can do withe the matrix rerouting one knob to another…awsome! Thas what i ever dreamed in the past on my Korg electribes and the yamahays.ītw. Instead for example have a look at the circuit editor from isotonic studios, its free and stays free, the pro version u get for small money. It just dont NEED a diisplay and this is good! How big do you want a screen on this little sweet machines? What u wanna see there? 3 Letters and a number? Would this editiing make better? No! I’m doing with synths and sequenzers for 20 years now.Īnd i really have to say, Novation did a brilliant job, no… they did the best job EVER on user-friendly, intuitive, haptic, surface feel, self-explaining, and and and… I’m nut sure if you own the 2 circuits, it just sounds like your opinion is because “somebody” said “something”. The Circuits seem to be selling well the way they are and there are lots of other options out there already, every one of them with a display. It’s not an MPC or an MC-909 but then again, that’s not what it was supposed to be. You really have to experience the workflow to see that a screen wouldn’t make a big difference. They’re missing out on great portable groovebox, but everyone has their own priorities. I get that some people just can’t get over the lack of a display. You can use editors on your iPad if you want to edit patches or samples and assign the macros any way you want. It’s fun to listen to what they do to the sound and go from there. ![]() The only real confusion with the Circuit here is the 8 macro knobs at the top. I get the feeling the reviewer really liked it and the lack of a screen was not a big factor. ![]() The last paragraph is nothing but praise. The next paragraph states “On the whole, the workflow is Mono Station’s trump card” so maybe the workflow isn’t all that bad. According to the review the lack of a screen makes it difficult to manage modulation when designing patches, which is not something done on the Circuit. To be fair that’s a review for the Circuit Mono Station, not the Circuit in the above article.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |